Видео

This video has the United Nations Climate Change disclaimer. Global warming was officially stated at 1.1°C in 1991 and 1.06°C in 2022. There is no mechanism that would allow greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. The back of the United Nation's IPCC science report states it took its greenhouse gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude where it is common high school level knowledge there is no greenhouse radiant energy. This is typical practice for deceptive marketing to state legal data transparency protecting the perpetrators from fraud prosecution. The IPCC has been transparent with its data acknowledging it is not dealing with active greenhouse gases. Earth's greenhouse effect is frequently used as a primary example to high school students of a system always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor absorbing all the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth with greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the radiating surface that is all around us everyday and can't have its overall effect changed. There is no further greenhouse radiant energy to interact with greenhouse gases. At 1% average tropospheric water vapor over 99% of earth’s greenhouse effect is from water vapor. Water vapor would hold earth's greenhouse effect in saturation if it were the only greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. Arctic warming is taking place with the proving mechanism being warm Atlantic Ocean waters migrating deeper and more frequently into the Arctic Ocean warming it and the region. That warmer water is causing a few weeks less of reflective snow and ice coverage resulting in more solar heat gain to the Arctic region surface. Atmospheric CO2 levels of 1200 ppm about three times what they are today would greatly invigorate C3 plants the majority of plant life on earth greatly greening the planet. 0.4% of the atmosphere is CO2 and on average 1% is H20 water vapor. (1% H20)/(0.4% CO2) = 25. Water vapor is 25 times more present in the atmosphere on average than CO2. Water vapor has an CO2e of 18, 18 X 25 = 450 CO2e total for water vapor to 1 CO2e for CO2. The Earth’s oceans have 3-1/2 million sea floor volcanic vents warming the water and changing it’s chemistry that have not been systematically accounted for.

This video has the United Nations Climate Change disclaimer. Global warming was officially stated at 1.1°C in 1991 and 1.06°C in 2022. There is no mechanism that would allow greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. The back of the United Nation's IPCC science report states it took its greenhouse gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude where it is common high school level knowledge there is no greenhouse radiant energy. This is typical practice for deceptive marketing to state legal data transparency protecting the perpetrators from fraud prosecution. The IPCC has been transparent with its data acknowledging it is not dealing with active greenhouse gases. Earth's greenhouse effect is frequently used as a primary example to high school students of a system always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor absorbing all the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth with greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the radiating surface that is all around us everyday and can't have its overall effect changed. There is no further greenhouse radiant energy to interact with greenhouse gases. At 1% average tropospheric water vapor over 99% of earth’s greenhouse effect is from water vapor. Water vapor would hold earth's greenhouse effect in saturation if it were the only greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. Arctic warming is taking place with the proving mechanism being warm Atlantic Ocean waters migrating deeper and more frequently into the Arctic Ocean warming it and the region. That warmer water is causing a few weeks less of reflective snow and ice coverage resulting in more solar heat gain to the Arctic region surface. Atmospheric CO2 levels of 1200 ppm about three times what they are today would greatly invigorate C3 plants the majority of plant life on earth greatly greening the planet. 0.4% of the atmosphere is CO2 and on average 1% is H20 water vapor. (1% H20)/(0.4% CO2) = 25. Water vapor is 25 times more present in the atmosphere on average than CO2. Water vapor has an CO2e of 18, 18 X 25 = 450 CO2e total for water vapor to 1 CO2e for CO2. The Earth’s oceans have 3-1/2 million sea floor volcanic vents warming the water and changing it’s chemistry that have not been systematically accounted for.

Global warming was officially stated at 1.1°C in 1991 and 1.06°C in 2022. There is no mechanism that would allow greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. The back of the United Nation's IPCC science report states it took its greenhouse gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude where it is common high school level knowledge there is no greenhouse radiant energy. This is typical practice for deceptive marketing to state legal data transparency protecting the perpetrators from fraud prosecution. The IPCC has been transparent with its data acknowledging it is not dealing with active greenhouse gases. Earth's greenhouse effect is frequently used as a primary example to high school students of a system always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor absorbing all the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth with greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the radiating surface that is all around us everyday and can't have its overall effect changed. There is no further greenhouse radiant energy to interact with greenhouse gases. At 1% average tropospheric water vapor over 99% of earth’s greenhouse effect is from water vapor. Water vapor would hold earth's greenhouse effect in saturation if it were the only greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. Arctic warming is taking place with the proving mechanism being warm Atlantic Ocean waters migrating deeper and more frequently into the Arctic Ocean warming it and the region. That warmer water is causing a few weeks less of reflective snow and ice coverage resulting in more solar heat gain to the Arctic region surface. Atmospheric CO2 levels of 1200 ppm about three times what they are today would greatly invigorate C3 plants the majority of plant life on earth greatly greening the planet. 0.4% of the atmosphere is CO2 and on average 1% is H20 water vapor. (1% H20)/(0.4% CO2) = 25. Water vapor is 25 times more present in the atmosphere on average than CO2. Water vapor has an CO2e of 18, 18 X 25 = 450 CO2e total for water vapor to 1 CO2e for CO2. The Earth’s oceans have 3-1/2 million sea floor volcanic vents warming the water and changing it’s chemistry that have not been systematically accounted for.

Global warming was officially stated at 1.1°C in 1991 and 1.06°C in 2022. There is no mechanism that would allow greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. The back of the United Nation's IPCC science report states it took its greenhouse gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude where it is common high school level knowledge there is no greenhouse radiant energy. This is typical practice for deceptive marketing to state legal data transparency protecting the perpetrators from fraud prosecution. The IPCC has been transparent with its data acknowledging it is not dealing with active greenhouse gases. Earth's greenhouse effect is frequently used as a primary example to high school students of a system always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor absorbing all the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth with greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the radiating surface that is all around us everyday and can't have its overall effect changed. There is no further greenhouse radiant energy to interact with greenhouse gases. At 1% average tropospheric water vapor over 99% of earth’s greenhouse effect is from water vapor. Water vapor would hold earth's greenhouse effect in saturation if it were the only greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. Arctic warming is taking place with the proving mechanism being warm Atlantic Ocean waters migrating deeper and more frequently into the Arctic Ocean warming it and the region. That warmer water is causing a few weeks less of reflective snow and ice coverage resulting in more solar heat gain to the Arctic region surface. Atmospheric CO2 levels of 1200 ppm about three times what they are today would greatly invigorate C3 plants the majority of plant life on earth greatly greening the planet. 0.4% of the atmosphere is CO2 and on average 1% is H20 water vapor. (1% H20)/(0.4% CO2) = 25. Water vapor is 25 times more present in the atmosphere on average than CO2. Water vapor has an CO2e of 18, 18 X 25 = 450 CO2e total for water vapor to 1 CO2e for CO2. The Earth’s oceans have 3-1/2 million sea floor volcanic vents warming the water and changing it’s chemistry that have not been systematically accounted for.

Global warming was officially stated at 1.1°C in 1991 and 1.06°C in 2022. There is no mechanism that would allow greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. The back of the United Nation's IPCC science report states it took its greenhouse gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude where it is common high school level knowledge there is no greenhouse radiant energy. This is typical practice for deceptive marketing to state legal data transparency protecting the perpetrators from fraud prosecution. The IPCC has been transparent with its data acknowledging it is not dealing with active greenhouse gases. Earth's greenhouse effect is frequently used as a primary example to high school students of a system always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor absorbing all the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth with greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the radiating surface that is all around us everyday and can't have its overall effect changed. There is no further greenhouse radiant energy to interact with greenhouse gases. At 1% average tropospheric water vapor over 99% of earth’s greenhouse effect is from water vapor. Water vapor would hold earth's greenhouse effect in saturation if it were the only greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. Arctic warming is taking place with the proving mechanism being warm Atlantic Ocean waters migrating deeper and more frequently into the Arctic Ocean warming it and the region. That warmer water is causing a few weeks less of reflective snow and ice coverage resulting in more solar heat gain to the Arctic region surface. Atmospheric CO2 levels of 1200 ppm about three times what they are today would greatly invigorate C3 plants the majority of plant life on earth greatly greening the planet. 0.4% of the atmosphere is CO2 and on average 1% is H20 water vapor. (1% H20)/(0.4% CO2) = 25. Water vapor is 25 times more present in the atmosphere on average than CO2. Water vapor has an CO2e of 18, 18 X 25 = 450 CO2e total for water vapor to 1 CO2e for CO2. The Earth’s oceans have 3-1/2 million sea floor volcanic vents warming the water and changing it’s chemistry that have not been systematically accounted for.

“There will never be a way for modern communities to feed themselves by local, small farms” I don’t believe this to be true, I envision communities in control of their food supply through locally embedded agricultural technologies I’ve invented a smart farming appliance that grows enough yield and variety to fully supply crops at the point of consumption. This way consumers will be food producers, circumnavigating the conventional ag system and in full control of their food supply

So it's all our fault then and nothing to do with the wasteful junk fast food industry? And the answer is to tie African farmers into buying GM seeds and pesticides. What a great idea...not.

I went to the website to vote as the video instructed, but there's nothing to vote on, or at least I can't find it.

I went to the website to vote as the video instructed, but, there's nothing to vote on, or at least I can't find it.

STOP SELLING ME FENTANYL!!!

i have to watch this video for school

As an African Economist, I disagree

Creative video summarizing a PhD thesis in less than 15 minutes😅😅😅😅

I think we want to classify our land and identify who owned it. In Asia density of population and other factors reduced local farm land dramatically.secondly local farmers canot compete with higher yield mechanised large scale farming.may be local system have a chance to fail feed entire humanity.

I disagree that we consume more than we produce. I think the West overconsumes and wastes loads of food at the expense of other countries cometimes.

You are stupid. You ask for regulation? Solutions from the government? , but they are always the root cause.

According to the IAASTD smallscale diverse agriculture with agro-ecological-techniques is about the only thing to safe the planet and it makes sense: Food needs to be cheaper than its value, for a society to enable development, so to be able to withstand a competing country. Thus historically those cultures proved victorious. It is reason why old Egypt and Rome had slaves and why our politicians and farming practices are promoting unsustainable mass agriculture which delays the problem into the future. The problem is we are already dependent on chemical industrial farming and global food supply-chains.

wait how is 2700 calories and 75g of protein enough? (a heavy working male needs 3000) It is assumed that 2000m² would sustain an average human (without (textile) fibers) of food, but if you try to plan a garden of that size it provides barely enough to feel safe in most farmlands of the world. Only some tropical prime locations with good (volcanic) soil an average temperature between 20-30C and air humidity around 50% can sustain this easily, providing 2x of what would be drastically needed. So just enough to live comfortable with high standards of nutrition and some reserves for bad harvest. In conclusion our global food system is highly reliant on fossil fuels, fertilizers, unsustainable practices of mass production and specializing and global supply chains, which is not safe at all. The notion that 2700 Calories and 75g protein suffice is misleading in this regard! I wouldn't advice one third of overproduction to be safe, but rather 4x the amount!! It seems to me we are not at the edge but almost over it in regards of sustainability and natural reserves. Please tell me how my equation is off

your video is played in a school

AHHHGGHHH Mr Krishnan is so knowledgeable😍😘😘

Yes I agree that local food systems need to be supported in every country though we need to balance this need with the biological facts of carrying capacity. Human populations can not continually grow if we expect to keep our earthly life support systems functional. I believe we need to pay indigenous folks to rebuild ecosystems that have supported their populations historically with carbon credit inputs from wealthy nations. In addition all human populations need to have access to family planning tools so families can decide the number of children they wish to have. Thank you for your critical information. Be well.

What about productivity growth lmao

As an agronomist in Africa am alarmed with the assumption that Africa needs seeds and inputs... we already have those in excess. What we need is a sustainable food system. The main failure is usually implementation of proven Policies!

If you give people free food when they don't work, they become dependent and have families, which makes more moutha that demand more food, and they still don't work. You feed their families, they make more people who don't work. Starvation in the third world is what keeps their people from overpopulation.

Beans lentils and cut the population by half !

was really surprised about that waste figure :(

We humans are great is finding sollution.. to great in the end bigger problems.

Sure... thats why netherlands force 50 % farmers out of business.. Makes no sense to me. Since world leaders turn Green / climate. Energy crisis and food crises rises Even entering war with Rusia

There's a population crisis.... the population is not increasing it is scarily decreasing, look at Japan and other countries, they have way more adult diapers then baby diapers...it shows you that there is a huge decline in population world wide...as soon as someone says pop is going up, I have to stop listening because the research has incorrect variables :(

Are you going to tell folks to start eating lab grown meat as well? Soylent green was not a movie, it is a documentary! 20 years from now your successors will be telling us to eat dead people. Or are you guys already doing it? Are you making synthetic lab grown meat?

Hey Evan. I’ve seen some of your research. Question, is it not misleading the public to tell them 1/3 of green house gases comes from agriculture? The ocean is the highest co2 producer, burning fossil fuel of any kind would be next. But fear mongering people to believe agriculture and food are “bad” or “responsible “ for climate change tells me your one of those NWO flakes. Have you ever took time to explain the components of co2. Have you ever explained to people that in every single experiment ever done with co2 and any plant, with extreme levels of co2 pumped into the grow rooms the plants grow up to 40% bigger? Do you suggest we send good old seed from Monsanto to the needy folks around the world. This is called propaganda, or conditioning. I’m betting that’s where the money comes from to fund your institue as well All the big wig shareholders who want to put a carbon tax on food make people live in 400square foot container homes, all the while loathing ourselves because “WE” are so called responsible for the mess. You and people like you confuse everything with your double talk and bullshyte. God sees you.

Nothing to do with Russia but globalists playing out their wet dreams based on Nazi t4 program

How relevant

9 years later, do you still have the same optimism? The use of synthetic fertilizers has deeply degraded and reduced the longevity of fertile soil, poses health risks with run off and contributes to climate change. Hunger is a distribution problem and when food is considered a commodity in a capitalist economy, there is no way you'll be able to redistribute that food equally. We can't keep going on like this and instead of doubling down on the way we've been doing things (technological advancement, population growth and economic inequality), maybe we should look to reversing all three.

how many of you are writing a essay about this?

My class loved it! A great way to learn about food insecurity!

Here in 2022😳

L bozo

This was such a great video until he started to beg for government and its noxious regulation

I'm watching this because my reacher told me to.

SUPERWEED

hey bro make sure you get those marks checked out for skin cancer its a silent killer my uncle got it and passed from it

“Countries of the Middle East” *shows Africa

Online conference "GLOBAL CRISIS. THIS ALREADY AFFECTS EVERYONE" on July 24, 2021! with translation to 60 languages. CREATIVE SOCIETY ALLATRAUNITES. COM

If the government controls the food; they control the people. Why did they banned growing gardens and having farm animals in Urban cities? So you are forced to go buy food at food markets and pay taxes. A lot of farmers have food rot of food that they aren't selling. Don't be bought buy bullshit.

This is a great video but the comment about us being more developed now than "having to wait for God to send a sign" was unnecessasy and since the story of Joseph and the Pharoah is actually in many religions not just christianity, it can be rude and offensive to many.

Population needs to be in balance with jobs, resources, nature and the environment. The virus is nature fighting back. Humans are crowding out all other species of plants and animals. Men need to be more responsible for their children or get a vasectomy. More people demand more resources. Endless population growth is not sustainable on a finite planet.

i had to write notes faster than i ever have to keep up with this video lol

cabalism can solve over population and world hunger

Well that was twelve minutes of my life I'm never getting back. Thanks, APES.